How bicycling will save the economy (if we let it)

Imagine getting a $3,000 to $12,000 tax rebate this year. Now imagine it coming again and again. Every year it grows by around a thousand dollars.
Imagine how this would change your daily life.
Sounds like a teabagger's wet dream, but it's actually a conservative estimate of how much you'd save by ditching your car, or even just one of your cars -- and getting on a bicycle instead.
Car-centric conditions don't always make it easy to choose the bicycle. Communities designed exclusively for motor vehicles impose a major financial penalty on those who are compelled to take on the expense of driving. But if you're one of those who lives in a bike-friendlier place, you'll be doing your local business community a good turn and padding Uncle Sam's pockets as well as your own if you trade four wheels for two.
In the many North American cities where two-wheeled transportation is taking off, a new bicycle economy is emerging. It's amazing how much money can stay in your community when it isn't being pumped into the gas tank, big insurance, and the auto market.
What will this new bicycle economy look like?
We don't have to guess. It's already emerging along urban, low-traffic bikeway networks nationwide. One thing is guaranteed: it includes a lot of new bike shops like this one on a bikeway in Baltimore -- one of five new bike shops to have opened in the last two years in that city. A 2008 study in Portland clocked bicycle-related industry alone as contributing $90 million to the local economy every year. Bicycle tourism is another huge boon to regions that can attract it -- in 2010, Wisconsin bragged of a yearly $1.5 billion bike economy [PDF].
Less obvious synergies abound as well. People who ride, just like people who drive, buy groceries, visit the doctor, need a new shirt sometimes, and enjoy dinner and a movie. They work. Their kids attend school. Despite the media attention given to mega-mileage supercommuters, for most people who depend on bikes for transportation, life works best with all these necessities in reasonable biking distance -- say, less than five miles -- from their home. Preferably along routes that don't include riding on highways or having to zip anxiously across them.
Bicycle parking is the indicator species of this new economy, with a business's enthusiasm for its two-wheeled clientele being easy to gauge by the quantity of bike racks out front. In Portland, businesses impatiently line up to replace their car parking with on-street bike racks. One local grocery store recently opened a location with more parking for bicycles than for cars.
Then there's the food cart boom that's overtaken Portland -- every previously vacant alley and parking lot, many along major bike routes, seems to have spawned a semi-permanent pod of them. As a business model, it's a natural response to a population that craves cheap lunch, prefers not to travel far, and doesn't need a 7' x 20' piece of real estate to park on.
There are many more local benefits of the bike economy, from lowering families' health care costs to reducing a business's need to invest in costly parking spaces for staff and customers. And you can't place a monetary value on happiness.
But as long as our local governments keep hearing strident resistance to rather than support for safe, bikeable and walkable streets, the bicycle economy will continue to be reined in -- by inadequate infrastructure, terrible zoning, and giant road expansion projects of the sort that tie up all transportation funding for decades to come.
The bicycle economy, unlike its fancier cousin transit-oriented development, is not about new development or raising property values. It's about bettering our existing communities. It's about making cities and suburbs that are built on an automotive scale navigable, instead, by human power. It's about providing the basics to everyone, in their neighborhood, now -- and along with that the choice to opt for that $3,000 to $12,000 yearly rebate.
There aren't very many economic scenarios in this country where everyone wins. But if you had to choose one single thing that could pull our neighborhoods, towns, and cities out of this murky pit of a recession, you'd do well to bet on the humble bicycle.
Biking graphicClick for a larger version.Infographic: Mgmt Design, courtesy of the National Building Museum 
Next: "Tearing down urban freeways to make room for a new bicycle economy."
Elly Blue is a writer and bicycle activist living in Portland, Oregon. You can find her on Twitter."

Fonte e imagens:
http://www.grist.org/biking/2011-02-28-how-bicycling-will-save-the-economy

Documentos de Permacultura, Agricultura e Educação ambiental para download

"Apresento aqui alguns documentos sobretudo obras de referência no campo da Permacultura, e outras vertentes em sustentabilidade dos recursos naturais e vida ecológica: Gradualmente irei colocando disponíveis outras obras:
1. A grande obra de Fukuoka, "A revolução de uma palha" http://rapidshare.com/files/456738898/010140.fukuoka.one.straw.pdf
2. De um dos mestres mundiais da Permacultura, a explicação do conceito base para iniciados e curiosos: http://rapidshare.com/files/456738939/Fundamentosdapermacultura-holmgren.pdf
3. Sendo a Permacultura um modo de estar e uma atitude e não só uma prática, pode existir tanto no campo como na cidade, aqui são apresentados exemplos e formas de Permacultura urbana: http://rapidshare.com/files/456739051/Urban_Permaculture.pdf
4. Para quem já tem muitas bases e pouco orçamento para os dispendiosos cursos de Permacultura, este é um bom auxiliar para avançar com a prática:
http://rapidshare.com/files/456738921/41036918-Curso-de-Design-Em-Permacultura.pdf"

Fonte:
http://naturezaartehumana.blogspot.com/2011/04/documentos-de-permaqcultura-agricultura.html?spref=fb

Cidadãos de Torres Vedras incentivados a criar hortas domésticas

Foto: Foto: Adriano Miranda/arquivo
in Jornal Público, 13.04.2011
Lusa 

"Os cidadãos da cidade de Torres Vedras estão a ser incentivados a criar hortas domésticas onde possam cultivar alimentos e trocá-los com outros cidadãos, através de um projecto de uma associação cultural.
“Queremos contrariar a ideia de que em casa não se pode ter uma horta e que só é possível se tivermos um terreno”, explicou o director-executivo da associação cultural Transforma, Luís Firmo, que pretende incentivar os cidadãos a criar hortas domésticas em vasos que poderão ter na varanda, na cozinha ou em qualquer outro espaço da habitação.

Na feira rural da cidade, que acontece uma vez por mês, a associação vai ter uma banca onde os cidadãos podem deixar a produção excedentária, como morangos, ervas aromáticas ou legumes, e trocá-la gratuitamente por outros que não tenham.

Com o projecto, a Transforma quer trazer os cidadãos para as artes através dos hábitos do quotidiano.

Além de workshops para ensinar as pessoas a criar as hortas e dar a conhecer as melhores práticas de cultivo dos produtos, a Transforma vai também promover iniciativas que procuram incentivar os cidadãos a “dialogar com as artes” enquanto outras formas de cultura. Até Junho, estão agendados eventos relacionados com alimentação saudável e com a compostagem doméstica, mas também com a literatura alusiva, por exemplo, a vegetais e frutos ou com as artes plásticas.

A decorrer até ao final do ano, o projecto tem também uma vertente educativa, em que as crianças podem adquirir pequenos vasos com sementes para levar para casa e cultivá-las."

Fonte e imagem:

Bike Hanger: Vertically Rotating, Multi-Level Bike Parking By Manifesto Architecture

The vertically-hung, space-saving Bike Hanger by Manifesto Architecture
by Kimberley Mok, Montreal, Canada
"It's a scenario familiar in many cities: ugly, unwieldy and badly-designed bike racks, with the worst of it being that there's never enough bike parking to go around (meaning messy clumps of bikes in public spaces, for example). And with space in urban areas usually at a premium, it makes sense to stack things vertically. The intriguing Bike Hanger from New York-based Manifesto Architecture does the vertical trick, but takes things a step further by hanging off the side of buildings in those underused, residual spaces between them.
According to ArchDaily, Bike Hanger was designed and shortlisted for the 2010 Seoul Cycle Design Competition, which called for ideas to improve the city's bike-friendliness and infrastructure.
The idea is to keep pedestrian flow of traffic free from bike interference, and public spaces free of unsightly globs of locked bikes that look like cycling disasters. Each rack unit can hold anywhere from 20 to 36 bicycles, and the units themselves can be agglomerated, creating rows of neatly stacked public bike racks.
bikehanger2.jpg
The canopy and frame would use recycled plastic, stainless steel and carbon frame. The hanger's rotation mechanism would be powered by good old-fashioned elbow grease, by pedalling a stationary bike hooked up into the hanger system, thus keeping energy and maintenance costs low.
bikehanger4.jpg
bikehanger3.jpg
On top of that, Bike Hangers could be designed as urban landmarks in their own right, creating another means of wayfinding for city dwellers.
One question that comes to mind is how a system like this could be protected from vandalism and theft -- after all, we've seen how public bike programs like Paris' Velib have been dealt a blow by irresponsible use. And what about long-term parking? But overall, the Bike Hanger's space-saving virtues, sensible structural format which allows for easy visual identification of each person's bike and its use of recycled materials makes it a pretty clever proposal for solving the bike parking dilemma."

Is dangerous cycling a problem?


"MPs could introduce a new offence of causing death by dangerous cycling. But how much of a danger do these two-wheeled travellers really pose?

There is little that divides UK public opinion more sharply than cyclists.
To their supporters, Britain's bike-riders are clean, green, commuters-with-a-conscience, who relieve congestion on the nation's roads while keeping themselves fit.
But to certain newspapers, and indeed plenty of motorists, they are "lycra louts", jumping red lights, hurtling past pedestrians on pavements and denying the Highway Code applies to them.
Now this debate - regularly articulated, with the aid of Anglo-Saxon dialect, during rush-hour traffic - has found a forum in the House of Commons, where MP Andrea Leadsom has introduced a private members' bill to create new crimes of causing death or serious injury through dangerous or reckless cycling.
She cites the case of Rhiannon Bennett, who was 17 when she was killed by a speeding cyclist in 2007. The cyclist - who, the court heard, had shouted at Rhiannon to "move because I'm not stopping" - was fined £2,200 and avoided jail.
The MP, herself a keen cyclist, insists she does not want to penalise Britons from getting on their bikes. Her intention is to ensure all road users take "equal responsibility" for their actions, as drivers are already subject to analogous legislation. The government has said it will consider supporting the bill.
But the discussion raises the question of how much of a danger bicycles actually pose on the nation's roads.
Cycling campaigners insist the popular perceptions of rampaging cyclists are not supported by statistical evidence. According to the Department for Transport (DfT), in 2009, the most recent year for which figures are available, no pedestrians were killed in Great Britain by cyclists, but 426 died in collisions with motor vehicles out of a total of 2,222 road fatalities.
Indeed, bike riders insist it is they who are vulnerable. Of the 13,272 collisions between cycles and cars in 2008, 52 cyclists died but no drivers were killed.
Alex Bailey of the Cyclists Touring Club (CTC), which lobbies on behalf of bike users, says valuable parliamentary time could and should be used more effectively to improve road safety. He says there is no need to change the law as twice in the past decade an 1861 act has been used to jail cyclists who killed pedestrians while riding on the pavement.
The notion of the marauding, aggressive cyclist causing rampage on the road, he insists, has little grounding in fact.
"It has a lot of currency in the media," he says. "But it's emotionally based, not rationally based. The problem is not about cyclists at all."
Certainly, few would argue that the boom in cycling has led to a transformation in the activity's public image.
Once it might have conjured up images like that of George Orwell's old maids "biking to Holy Communion through the mists of the autumn mornings".
Now, at least in built-up areas, one stereotype, rightly or wrongly, is of well-paid men in expensive leisurewear with a sense of entitlement and a refusal to conform to the same rules as everyone else.
Tony Armstrong, chief executive of Living Streets, which represents pedestrians, says that while most cyclists behave safely, it should not be ignored that "a significant minority cause concern and fear among pedestrians by their reckless and irresponsible behaviour".
He acknowledges deaths and serious injuries caused by cyclists are relatively rare, but adds that the impact of more mundane anti-social behaviour is more difficult to quantify.
"Although fatalities are recorded, there is no way of measuring how many people have been intimidated or left feeling vulnerable by irresponsible cycling," he says. "We know from our supporters that this is a major concern."
Indeed, Professor Stephen Glaister, director of motorists' advocacy group the RAC Foundation, suggests much of the hostility on the roads stems from a lack of understanding and suggests levelling out the legislation would reassure drivers that the rules were being applied fairly.
"In some ways, road users are tribal in their nature; loyal to their fellow drivers or cyclists, and dismissive of - or antagonistic towards - those who choose to travel by another method," he says.
"Subjecting everyone who uses the public highway to the same laws might actually forge better relationships between us all and erode the idea held by many that those who travel by an alternative mode routinely make up rules of the road to suit themselves."
But some bike-users reject the idea that anecdote and mutual suspicion should drive policy.
In particular, Guardian columnist and cycling advocate Zoe Williams says she is exasperated by the references to red light-jumping whenever bikes are discussed.
She insists the practice largely stems from fear, not arrogance, due to the high number of cyclists killed each year by heavy goods vehicles turning left at junctions, and says ministers should concentrate on tackling such deaths if they really want to make the roads safer.
She adds: "Can you imagine if every time we talked about cars people complained about drivers doing 80mph on the motorway?
"Most cyclists are actually pretty timid. You're constantly living on your wits because you're vulnerable. Instead of drawing up laws like this we should be encouraging cycling and making it easier."
The discussion will continue at Westminster. But legislating away the antipathy between cyclists and drivers will surely be a momentous challenge for MPs."

Conservative MP Andrea Leadsom urges MPs to back a change to the law

"The first-ever cycle crime

Kirkpatrick Macmillan's bicycle
  • Kirkpatrick Macmillan, a blacksmith from Keir Mill, Dumfriesshire, is credited by most historians with inventing the pedal bicycle in 1839
  • In 1842, a newspaper report describes "a gentleman from Dumfries-shire bestride a velocipede of ingenious design" who knocked over a little girl in Glasgow's Gorbals area and was fined five shillings
  • Many believe the offender must have been Macmillan himself. He died in 1878 without ever having patented his invention

"Great Britain cycle safety statistics

  • In 2008, pedal bikes made up 1.8% of urban, non-motorway traffic but were involved in just 0.25% of pedestrian deaths and below 1% of serious pedestrian injuries
  • During the same year, there were 13,272 recorded collisions between cars and bicycles, resulting in the deaths of 52 cyclists and no car drivers or passengers
  • A study of collisions between cyclists and other vehicles from 2005-07 found police allocated blame to drivers in 60% of cases, to the cyclist in 30% and to both parties in the remainder
Source: Department for Transport

"Pedestrian casualties 2001-09

  • Killed by cycles: 18
  • Seriously injured by cycles: 434
  • Killed by cars: 3,495
  • Seriously injured by cars: 46,245
Figures apply to Great Britain. Source: Department for Transport"

Fonte e imagens:

Bike Buddies - MUBi


Imagine que quer começar a andar de bicicleta em Lisboa e não sabe como.
Há utilizadores experientes de bicicleta em contexto urbano, que estão dispostos a ajudá-la(o).
É isso mesmo que são os Bike Buddies, uma iniciativa da MUBi - Associação pela Mobilidade Urbana em Bicicleta

Bike Buddy
O Bike Buddy (BB) é um projecto de mentorado de utilização de bicicleta da MUBi - Associação pela Mobilidade Urbana em Bicicleta -, que consiste no aconselhamento e acompanhamento de novos utilizadores de bicicleta nas suas primeiras deslocações em contexto urbano.

O que são os Bike Buddies
São sócios da MUBi que acompanham novos utilizadores nas suas primeiras experiências de bicicleta pela cidade, partilhando a sua experiência, aconselhando novos utilizadores de bicicletas quanto a rotas, equipamento, segurança, legislação, atalhos e truques que permitam facilitar a deslocação de bicicleta pela cidade.

Descrição do serviço
Serviço dirigido a potenciais utilizadores de bicicleta que consiste num tutor temporário que acompanha o utilizador inexperiente durante duas semanas (duas/três vezes por semana) nos trajectos casa-trabalho-casa, com o objectivo de familiarizar o novo utilizador com a bicicleta como meio de transporte em contexto urbano.
O objectivo do BB não é ensinar pessoas a andar de bicicleta. Para recorrer a este serviço é necessário, aliás, ter conhecimento prévio sobre como utilizar eficazmente a bicicleta e, preferencialmente, ter já alguma prática e destreza na condução de bicicleta.
O serviço é prestado a quem quer que o solicite, desde que tenha uma bicicleta em condições de utilização segura.
Este é um serviço prestado pela MUBi de forma gratuita (todos os buddies são voluntários).

Objectivos
Que quem quer começar a andar de bicicleta na cidade sinta que o pode fazer com o acompanhamento e segurança de utilizadores de bicicleta mais experientes. Que isto se possa traduzir em mais gente a andar de bicicleta.

Bike Buddy: De quem e para quem?
Da MUBi para todos.

Pedir um Bike Buddy, aqui: http://bikebuddy.mubi.pt/

Artigo no Jornal Público - Voluntários ajudam ciclistas inexperientes a pedalar na cidade: http://www.publico.pt/Local/voluntarios-ajudam-ciclistas-inexperientes-a-pedalar-na-cidade_1487976#Comente

Fonte e imagem: http://bikebuddy.mubi.pt/inicio.html

foto © lisbon cycle chichttp://www.flickr.com/photos/lisboncyclechic/5162048822/shapeimage_3_link_0