Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Arquitectura Paisagista. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Arquitectura Paisagista. Mostrar todas as mensagens

Street fighter: how Jane Jacobs saved New York from Bulldozer Bob

‘She picked up things no one else could see’ … Jane Jacobs holding a petition.
Photograph: Phil Stanziola/World Telegram & Sun/Library of Congress
"Robert Moses was the despotic planner hellbent on building four-lane highways through neighbourhoods. She was the cyclist who stopped him. A new film, Citizen Jane, revisits their David and Goliath struggle for the soul of New York

“There is nobody against this,” insisted a flustered Robert Moses at the hearing for his plan to drive a four-lane highway through New York’s Washington Square Park in 1958. “Nobody, nobody, nobody but a bunch of ... a bunch of mothers.”

The despotic city planner hadn’t counted on the determination of the mothers in question, or the ferocity of their leader – an owlish stenographer and freelance journalist by the name of Jane Jacobs. As part of his insatiable hunger for grand public works, Moses wanted to extend Fifth Avenue through the square, ostensibly to ease congestion, but with the real motive of rewarding developers and raising property values south of the park, where he had already razed a swath of Greenwich Village for redevelopment.

Jacobs, who lived in the West Village and knew how much her neighbourhood valued the park, mobilised a vocal coalition of campaigners, residents and politicians, who eventually halted the project. “It is very discouraging to do our best to make the city more habitable,” Jacobs wrote to the mayor, “and then to learn that the city is thinking up schemes to make it uninhabitable.”

That hearing was the only time Jacobs and Moses ever crossed paths, the single meeting in an oft-recounted, years-long David and Goliath saga of the saintly protector of the streets fighting the villainous master builder. Their duel, which came to symbolise the struggle of “bottom-up” versus “top-down”, is the focus of a new documentary, Citizen Jane: Battle for the City, made to commemorate her centenary last year.

Now arriving in the UK, the film brings home the enduring relevance of her ideas. Three years after her Washington Square victory, the inquisitive self-taught journalist published a book that would change urban planning for ever. The Death and Life of Great American Cities was a rallying cry against the destruction the broad brush of postwar urban renewal was wreaking on the fine grain of the city.With startling precision and sensitivity, Jacobs detailed how streets and spaces are actually used by people, as opposed to how they are perceived from above on the politician’s grand plan. Jacobs deployed her training in zoology, geology and political science to look at the city through an anthropologist’s eye, using ecological metaphors to describe urban life as a complex and fragile ecosystem. As one of the talking heads in the documentary puts it: “She was the hypersensitive antennae, picking up on things no one else could see.”

To her, the success of a vibrant city came from the “intricacy of pavement use, bringing with it a constant succession of eyes”. This daily “street ballet” of public interaction that unfolded outside her house is depicted with archive footage of bustling Manhattan dating from the early to mid 20th century. “There must be eyes upon the street,” she wrote, “eyes belonging to those we might call the natural proprietors of the street. The buildings on a street equipped to handle strangers, and to insure the safety of both residents and strangers, must be oriented to the street. They cannot turn their backs or blank sides on it and leave it blind.

It all sounds like common sense now, but to the postwar planners – infected with the modernist dogma of sweeping the slate clean to make way for tower blocks in wide open spaces – this was an affront to everything they had been taught. Jacobs had witnessed at first hand the failures of urban renewal in Philadelphia, where a zoning masterplan siloed different functions – housing, industry, offices, shops –into towers, separated by yawning public spaces lined with retail units that were soon lying empty. People weren’t behaving as they should, the planners said, refusing to accept that their brave new concrete vision wasn’t tuned to how citizens actually behave.

The documentary forcefully charts Jacobs’ battles and the level of destruction power-hungry Moses inflicted on existing communities in the name of improving New York for the greater public good. We see the carnage inflicted by the Cross Bronx Expressway, the country’s first major urban highway, which carved a ravine through the borough, fatally separating north and south Bronx in a piece of vandalism described by writer Mike Davis as “the single most destructive act in the history of US cities”.

The Lower Manhattan Expressway, which Jacobs and her allies halted, would have inflicted a similar fate on Soho and Little Italy – conveniently framed by Moses as a crime-ridden “hell’s hundred acres”, to be swept clean by gleaming new arteries topped with futuristic mega-structures. Old TV clips show “Big Bob the Builder” oozing arrogance and reptilian cunning, as he condemns whole areas, describing a low-income part of Harlem as “a cancerous growth that has to be carved out” and scoffing at the idea of compensating landowners who stand in his way: “Do you think anything would ever be built if we did that?” All that’s missing is footage of him being chauffeur-driven around the city in his stretch limo with pigskin seats.

By contrast, Jacobs is the indomitable champion of the people, gliding around town on her bicycle, corralling campaigns into action. She was a master of popular media, choreographing stunts like mock funerals for neighbourhoods and staging colourful protests with snappy badges and banners. Proclaimed Queen Jane by Vogue and photographed by Diane Arbus for Esquire, she counted Eleanor Roosevelt and Susan Sontag among her supporters.

If it all sounds a little black and white, that’s because it is. Told, retold and even produced as a children’s story, the pantomime goody-baddy narrative has become drastically oversimplified, a problem that this film does little to address. Yes, Moses was a bullying megalomaniac, but he also built 13 bridges, two tunnels, 637 miles of highways, 658 playgrounds, 10 giant public swimming pools, 17 state parks, not to mention dozens of housing projects and city parks.

Neither should Jacobs’ theories and her influence on contemporary “good practice” go totally unquestioned. “Jacobs romanticised social conditions that were already becoming obsolete,” says urban sociologist Sharon Zukin, while Deyan Sudjic, director of the Design Museum in London, believes her “underlying message is of unblinking paranoia”.

Jacobs’ writings have led to a collective received wisdom – driven by the spurious discipline of “placemaking” – that decrees every street frontage should be “active”, every public space should bustle with civic life, every bit of the city should be configured around clear “desire lines” from A to B, with citizens’ movement intricately choreographed. It is a world in which narrow alleyways and quiet corners are banished in favour of 24-hour curated vibrancy.

Ironically, in an echo of Big Bob’s hunger for demolition, Jacobs’ arguments are now being deployed to raze postwar council estates across the world, her principles mobilised to lambast “sink estates”, conflating social problems and lack of maintenance with a particular style of architecture. They are the new cancer to be carved out. At the same time, the kinds of historic districts Jacobs helped to save now often feel like open-air museums, places as soulless and devoid of real life as the high-rises she so despised.

A hint of this would have added a welcome cautionary tone to the film. Instead it ends with Saskia Sassen, the Dutch sociologist, railing against China’s new megacities as “Moses on steroids”, over footage shot from a speeding car. If urbanists got out and looked more closely, as Jacobs herself did, they’d find that urban life continues to flourish in unexpected places. As critic Paul Goldberger concludes, Jacobs’ finest quality was “a willingness to doubt the received wisdom and trust our eyes instead”.”

When you’re an architect …


"· you have probably heard all 1,000 songs off your ipod in just one night

· you spend hours looking at & buying arch books but never have the time to actually read them

On How to Make an Attractive City

"Cities are a big deal. We pretty much all have to live in them. We should try hard to get them right. So few cities are nice, very few out of many thousands are really beautiful; embarrassingly the more appealing ones tend to be old, which is weird because we’re mostly much better at making things now.

Rules:
1. Not to chaotic, not too ordered;
2. Visible life
3. Compact
4. Orientation and mystery
5. Scale
6. Make it local"

Paisagismo: a chave para o futuro de nossas cidades

  • 30 Novembro, 2015, 
  • por Kirt Martin, Traduzido por Camilla Sbeghen

    "Desfrutar do tempo livre em espaços públicos bem desenhados é um dos aspectos mais importantes para a maior parte dos que vivem em uma cidade. Então, por que é investido tão pouco tempo e dinheiro para seu desenho? Neste artigo, publicado originalmente na revista Metropolis com o título "Designing Outdoor Public Spaces is Vital to the Future of our Cities", Kirt Martin, vice-presidente de Design e Marketing do escritório de mobiliário urbano Landscape Forms, afirma que o paisagismo e o design industrial focados no setor público são a chave para a saúde e a felicidade das cidades. 
    Paisagismo: a chave para o futuro de nossas cidades, A terceira parte do High Line em Nova York. Imagem © Iwan Baan, 2014
    Todos apreciamos nosso tempo em espaços abertos. Mas por que prestamos tão pouca atenção em seu desenho?
    Como designer de mobiliário urbano, sempre tenho curiosidade sobre quanto as pessoas apreciam os espaços ao ar livre. Eu gosto de ter como tema de conversa perguntas sobre a descrição de grandes cidades como Nova IorqueChicago ou Paris e o que ficou marcado na memória dos visitantes quando estiveram ali. Se este não é o caso, pergunto onde iriam e o que fariam se ganhassem  $25,000 para gastar nas férias sonhadas. Suas melhores experiências em uma cidade célebre ou em uma paisagem natural sempre têm algo em comum, exceto por um ponto: aquelas que são mais memoráveis sempre têm como cenário os espaços ao ar livre. 
    A coleção Multiplicidade desenhada por Yves Behar e fuseproject. Imagem Cortesia de Landscape Forms
    A coleção Multiplicidade desenhada por Yves Behar e fuseproject. Imagem Cortesia de Landscape Forms
    Temos estudos que demostram que as pessoas tendem a ser mais saudáveis, mais felizes e ter uma vida mais duradoura em áreas com acesso a natureza, incluindo espaços urbanos com áreas verdes. Os espaços ao ar livre são os menos custosos para criar e os que geram a mais alta rentabilidade - levando em conta aspectos como a melhora da vida em comunidade, saúde e riqueza, além da geração de atividades econômicas nas áreas circuncidantes. Com um número crescente de pessoas que se refugiam em cidades - desde jovens profissionais até aposentados - os espaços públicos verdes e a vibrante paisagem urbana são considerados fatores chave que atraem tanto os residentes como negócios.
    Apesar disso, não damos aos espaços livres o mesmo valor e suporte econômico que conferimos aos edifícios e interiores. Calculamos o valor em dólares por metro quadrado dos edifícios e interiores mas não valorizamos os metros quadrados das áreas livres. Não conta-se com uma análise de viabilidade econômica para o desenho de espaços exteriores, quando poderia e deveria ser realizada. Considero também que o desenho e inovação nas áreas exteriores públicas e privadas é um tema pendente, e o primeiro passo para assumir este desafio é melhorar as habilidades e talentos dos arquitetos paisagistas, os profissionais melhor preparados para desenhar estes espaços. 
    Sistema de Reciclagem do Central Park desenhado por Landor Associates. Imagem Cortesia de Landscape Forms
    Sistema de Reciclagem do Central Park desenhado por Landor Associates. Imagem Cortesia de Landscape Forms
    Chegou o momento da história em que a arquitetura da paisagem tem algo muito importante para dizer, e devemos escutar. Os arquitetos paisagistas aplicam uma disciplina baseada no pensamento holístico. Eles entendem o ambiente natural, o ambiente construído e as relações entre ambos. Além do mais, estão preparados para assumir a liderança no desenho de espaços exteriores e captar a atenção do público nos mesmos.
    Recentes projetos destacados como o High Line e o Millennium Park criaram fortes laços com a comunidade local, e os famosos urbanistas responsáveis por estes projetos suscitaram o interesse do público. Entretanto, ainda existe uma grande legião de paisagistas talentosos e inspirados que deveriam ser parte primordial do desenho e visualização dos espaços exteriores.
    "Cloud Gate" de Anish Kapoor, escultura no Millennium Park em Chicago. Imagem © Urban Land Institute
    "Cloud Gate" de Anish Kapoor, escultura no Millennium Park em Chicago. Imagem © Urban Land Institute
    Este também é um momento no qual a história desempenha um papel útil para a arquitetura da paisagem. Nós que somos provedores de mobiliário urbano, partícipes do desenho e ativação dos espaços exteriores, devemos formar parte deste desafio, e estou disposto a assumi-lo buscando os meios para garantir a rentabilidade de espaços exteriores desenhados em términos de comunidade, identidade, bem-estar, meio-ambiente e economia. Estou focado em liderar a inovação junto com soluções graduais mais além de elementos padrões como lixeiros, estacionamento para bicicletas e bancos, para ajudar as pessoas a desfrutarem de experiências inesquecíveis ao ar livre. Os exteriores iniciam no exato momento em que saímos das nossas portas, por isso são requeridas novas ideias para os espaços adjacentes aos edifícios. É necessário também integrar a tecnologia aos espaços públicos, respeitando as qualidades especiais de cada contexto.
    Me sinto entusiasmado por este esforço e acredito que, com a colaboração de paisagistas e outros profissionais do design na indústria do mobiliário urbano, podemos suscitar interesses e promover um maior investimento em espaços exteriores que criem memória e significado. Juntos podemos criar uma verdadeira mudança na paisagem urbana, que é o nosso futuro.
    Kirt Martin é vice-presidente de Design e Marketing de Landscape Forms, liderando as equipes criativas de desenvolvimento de produto, marketing e comunicações desta companhia. Martin é um premiado designer industrial que dirigiu previamente a área de designer em Turnstone, uma divisão de Steelcase."

    The great garden swindle: how developers are hiding behind shrubbery, por Oliver Wainwright

    A High Line for London? What the Braithwaite viaduct in Shoreditch might
    look like. Photograph: Bishopsgate Goodsyard
    16.04.2015

    "From trees on bridges to magical parks, London’s most damaging developments are using green garnish as a decoy to distract from what’s really going on

    Spring has sprung and developers are getting green-fingered. Across London, their planning applications are sprouting leaves and bursting into bloom. They’re promising trees on bridges and jungles in the clouds, sky-gardens and life-giving linear parks, along with a whole network of green ribbons weaving through town.
    Who could say no to this fecund vision for London? What mean-spirited planning committee would stand in the way of this pastoral dream? Very few can resist the lure of a good garden. That is precisely the problem.
    Developers have got wise to the power of a few plants in easing their bloated schemes through the planning system. They’ve realised that a little green garnish can mask a multitude of sins. A clutch of 40-storey luxury apartment towers in a conservation area, you say? But check out that lovely lawn! A bridge-shaped tourist attraction for a stretch of the Thames that doesn’t need another crossing,to be built at vast expense to the taxpayer? But what nice shrubs it has! The word “garden” has never been misused as such a damaging decoy.
    If ever evidence were needed that the promised planting of a CGI mirage might not be as good in reality, it can be found 150 metres up in the air at No 20 Fenchurch Street. The 37-storey Walkie-Talkie tower was given planning permission in an area never intended for tall buildings – way outside the City’s planned “cluster” – on the sole basis that it would come with a majestic “sky garden”.
    The Walkie Talkie 'Sky Garden' … vision vs reality.
    Pinterest
     The Walkie-Talkie ‘Sky Garden’ … vision vs reality. Image: 20 Fenchurch Street
    The planning application featured a storyboard of seductive images, from pensioners mingling among the cherry blossom to visitors staring out in awe at the neighbouring towers, all from the vantage point of this fairytale bower in the sky. Policies could be breached and all would be forgiven for the joy this Babylonian utopia would bring.
    The reality, as documented in these pages, is more like a couple of rockeries and a few trees in pots. It has all the sylvan charm of an office lobby – a public space for which you must book in advance and go through airport-style security to savour.
    It is an underwhelming precedent that makes the proposed garden bridge seem all the more unlikely to deliver the promised dream of a floating forest across the Thames. Joanna Lumley’s plan, that people will be able to “walk through woodlands over one of the greatest rivers in the world,” is more likely to end up seeing crowds shuffling across a windswept deck, picking their way between a few shrubs that are clinging on for dear life.
    A closer look at the planning application reveals what the feted bridge will actually look like from the south bank. Buried in the Environmental Statement, Volume 8, Appendix 15, page 27, lurks a verified view of the reality of this great chunk of engineering. It will be a copper-clad aircraft carrier, topped with a meagre green sprinkle – what my colleague Rowan Moore so elegantly described as “urban parsley”. A judicial review has been launched against the planning permission.
    The garden bridge … vision vs reality?
    Pinterest
     The garden bridge … vision vs reality? Image: Garden Bridge Trust
    It’s easy to giggle at the folly of the garden bridge, but this wilting parsley has become a scourge. Across London, this green dressing is being used to soften the blow of steroidal overdevelopment, with slivers of park threaded between bulging apartment blocks. On the Greenwich Peninsula, where the developer Knight Dragon has almost halved its affordable housing commitment, the flats are currently being marketed with “views of Central Park”. They must be jolly high.
    Some of the apartment blocks already built there have tried the “vertical garden” trick too, with forlorn patches of green wall hanging off the facade like sticking plasters trying to hide the bin store. As one Twitter wit put it when I posted a photo of the wretched thing: “Certainly sir, a two-bed maisonette. And would you like salad with that?”
    The former Heygate estate in Elephant and Castle is being recast as “Elephant Park”, because there will be some greenery in the middle of the development – to be planted long after Lend Lease’s elephant of regeneration has charged through and trampled the council flats to dust. Further west, among the thicket of towers currently sprouting between Vauxhall and Nine Elms, will one day weave a kilometre-long linear park, or “a sustainable green backbone” as the developer Ballymore has it.
    “This extraordinary green channel will be entirely open to the public and a focal point for shopping, sports, leisure and recreation, outdoor events and all forms of community life,” they coo. “Its edges will be lined with homes, shops, cafes, leisure venues and other attractions to draw people in and activate the space.”
    The 'sustainable green backbone' proposed to weave through Nine Elms.
    Pinterest
     The ‘sustainable green backbone’ proposed to weave through Nine Elms. Image: Nine Elms Vauxhall Partnership
    But with most of the development being marketed to overseas investors, who are unlikely to ever set foot here, it’s hard to imagine what kind of community life will occur on the great green carpet. Still, at least it will provide a “visual amenity” for those looking down from their £9m penthouses, if they ever bother to collect the keys.
    The other side of town, at Bishopsgate Goodsyard in Shoreditch, the same developer is using a similar strategy of Potemkin planting to distract attention away from what they’re really doing on the other side of the hedge. London will be gifted with a spectacular new High Line, they trumpet, with a pocket park perched atop the crumbling remains of the old Victorian railway arches. Having suffered decades of neglectful vandalism, the Braithwaite viaduct – one of the oldest rail structures in the world – will be reincarnated as a “rich multi-layered three-dimensional landscape concept,” complete with bountiful retail pavilions and something that looks like a Swiss chalet.
    Views of the new park are, as ever, carefully choreographed so as not to show the seven towers of luxury flats that will loom over your head as you and the rest of Tech City guzzle your lunch on a small patch of grass. There may only be 10% affordable housing in the £800 m development – in boroughs where policy aims for up to 50% – but oh! How about that lovely multi-layered landscape concept? Just look at those bushes ..."

    Top doctor backs 'garden gym' idea



    Royal College of Physicians president Sir Richard Thompson said plants helped reduce stress, anger and depression.
    He added the fourth biggest cause of death in the UK was a lack of activity, making it important to provide green spaces in which people could exercise.
    He made the comments at a green cities conference in central London.
    'Very impressive'
    Although a growing number of scientific studies have produced evidence supporting the idea that urban green spaces are good for human wellbeing, the issue still remains on the margins of healthcare strategies.
    Formal garden and Caucasian elm, Hyde Park (Image: BBC)
    Looking at a diverse array of flowering plants can help reduce stress, studies suggest
    But Sir Richard observed: "When we look into the science of the beneficial effects of plants and gardening, there is quite a decent set of papers to read."
    Referring to a series of "very impressive" controlled studies in the US, Sir Richard said they showed that gardens improved the mood within hospitals, reducing stress levels among patients, families and staff.
    "What was very important was that the gardens had to have biodiversity - a variation of plants," he told delegates.
    Among heart patients, the gardens were also shown to reduce post-operative anxiety, resulting in a reduction of medication.
    But, he added: "Evidence showed that concrete gardens had no effect at all, so you had to have green gardens."
    Sir Richard, a patron of Thrive - a charity that champions the benefits of gardening among people with disabilities or mental ill health - went on to explain how scientific studies had documented the health benefits of gardening.
    "It improves your mood, increases flexibility, improves your balance and reduces the number of falls, which is a great problem for older people living at home by themselves."
    He added that just getting outdoors had health benefits.
    "We now know - from a recent study - that sunlight reduces blood pressure and a small reduction of blood pressure in the population produces a significant reduction of cardiovascular disease.
    He concluded that urban green spaces could help ease the strain on health budgets.
    "At a population scale, it can offer huge savings to the NHS by reducing the burden of preventable diseases, such as diabetes and heart disease.
    "Some people say there is a gym outside your window, and it is much cheaper than a gym subscription."
    Opening the International Green City Conference, International Association of Horticultural Producers (AIPH) secretary general Tim Briercliffe said urban dwellers were being cheated.
    "Too often, we settle for second-rate landscapes because we do not know what it could be like," he told delegates.
    He added that the AIPH event would "expose the foolishness of using the landscape as the place that savings can be made"."

    Fonte e imagem: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26871970

    Thrive: http://www.thrive.org.uk/